The Aftermath of Violence: The Lived Experience Phenomena of Assault in Nursing

The following represents the research and resulting doctoral dissertation  (Feb. 2016) of KATHLEEN CLARK, Ph.D.  She may be contacted at the University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Abstract

Despite the high incidence of violence directed at registered nurses while on duty, there is limited qualitative data that explores the lived experience of returning to the workplace after an assaultive incident. This phenomenological study sought to explore and analyze the phenomena of registered nurses who are employed in high-risk settings. The research questions considered the detailed descriptions of the experiences of nurses returning to the workplace. The conceptual framework was resiliency, as these participants continued to survive and thrive after the adverse assaultive events. Data were collected using in-depth interviews from purposeful sampling. Nine registered nurses working in the high risk areas of inpatient psychiatry and emergency departments provided detailed descriptions about the phenomena. Data management was an inductive, iterative analysis completed and facilitated by the use of NVivo 10 software program. The study found that participants had a brief emotional response post assault mitigated by the community of nursing personnel from their immediate surroundings and felt that assault was “part of the job.” Providing a true culture of safety would include enhancements to the internal community of bedside nursing practice. In addition, research is needed on interventions that can effectively enhance the internal community after assault by patients. This study contributes to positive social change by providing registered nurses, an oppressed group, a voice to mitigate negative consequences associated with assault in the hospital setting.

Selected REFERENCES in  Qualitative/Phenomenology Research in Health Services

                                       

Compiled by Robert E. Hoye, Ph.D.                                                 January 7, 2017

Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2007). Using Hermeneutic Phenomenology to Investigate How Experienced Practitioners Learn to Communicate Clinical Reasoning. The Qualitative Report, 12(4), 612- 638.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5^th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (1998). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (3^rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Company.

Corben, V. (1999). Misusing phenomenology in nursing research: Identifying the issues.

     Nurse Researcher, 6(3). 52-66.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design; Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method  

            approach (2^nd Ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating  

quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Collecting qualitative data (pp. 212-242)

Creswell, J.W (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

             approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated. 197

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among

             five approaches (3^rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fjelland, R., & Gjengedal, E. (1994). A theoretical foundation for nursing as a science.  In P. Benner (Eds.), Interpretive phenomenology, embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness (pp. 3- 26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-260.

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4): 597-607.

Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2005). Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London, UK: SAGE.

  Hycner, R. H. (1999). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 143-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Johnson, B. R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(3): 282-292.

Key, J. (1997). Qualitative Research. Retrieved July 10, 20016, from http://www.okstate.edu/ag/agedcm4h/academic/aged5980a/5980/newpage21.htm

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. New York, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Long, T., & Johnson, M. (2000). Rigor, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 4:30-7.

Lopez, K., & Willis, D. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 726-735.   

Mason, M. (2010, August). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative   

     interviews. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research

     (Vol. 11, No. 3).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded

      sourcebook. (2^nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.                  

Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London, UK: Routledge.

Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification

            strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Munhall, P. (2006). Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Munhall, P. (2006). A phenomenological method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp. 145-210). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Nigatu, T. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/ tilahunigatu/qualitative-data-analysis-11895136

Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(2): 34-36.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1): 7-14.

Plager, K. (1994). Hermeneutic phenomenology: a methodology for family health and health promotion study in nursing. In P. Benner (Eds.), Interpretive phenomenology, embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness (pp. 65-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Polkinghorne, D. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 41-60). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

QSR International, (2014). NVIVO 10 for windows: Getting started. Retrieved from

            www. qsrinternational.com

Polit, D. & Hungler, B. (1999). Nursing Research: Principle and Method, (6^th ed.).  Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Company.

Ratcliff, D. (1995) Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. Retrieved June 6, 2016, from http://qualitativeresearch.ratcliffs.net/Validity.pdf.

Rycroft-Malone, J., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., Titchen, A., & Estabrooks, C. (2002). Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care, 11:174–180.

Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(3), 254-267.

Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.

Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.

Speziale, H., & Carpenter, D. (2006). Qualitative Research in Nursing, Advancing the Humanistic Imperative (4^th ed.). Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: an introduction to phenomenological psychology (2^nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.

Sewell, M. (1999). The use of qualitative interviews in evaluation. Retrieved 4^th September, 2016, from http://ag.arizona.edu/fcr/fs/cyfar/Exisrec5.htm.

Tufford, L. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative research. Retrieved from http://qsw.sagepub. com/content/11/1/80.

Trochim, W. M. (2006). Qualitative validity. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualval.php

Valenzuela, D., & Shrivastava, P. (2008). Interview as a method for qualitative research. Retrieved June 11, 2016, from http://www.public.asu.edu/~kroel/www500/Interview%20Fri.pdf

Valle, R., King, M., & Halling, S. (1989). Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11 - 30.

van Manen, M. (2003). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2^nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press.

van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the Dark: Phenomenological Studies in Interpretive Inquiry. London, ON: Althouse Press.

van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2^nd ed.). London, ON: The Althouse Press.

van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.

van Manen, M. (1989). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, UK: Althouse Press.

Wilson, H., & Hutchinson, S. (1991). Triangulation of qualitative methods: Heideggerian hermeneutics and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 1(2): 263-276.

Relationship Between Nurse Staffing and Quality of Care in Louisiana Nursing Homes by Veronica Kercado, Ph.D.

As Chair of the Faculty Dissertation Committee for Dr. Veronica Kercado, I am pleased to share the ABSTRACT of her dissertation, completed in April, 2016 at Walden University.  Dr. Jim Goes served as   Committee Member.

Abstract

In 2014, Louisiana experienced substantive issues with quality of care in nursing homes. The state had the lowest nurse staffing level among all states, and 7,666 deficiencies for immediate jeopardy violations were recorded from 2011 to 2013. Despite ample research on nurse staffing and quality of care, there is no consensus on how higher nurse staffing relates to quality. The purpose of this quantitative, correlational research was to determine the relationship between nurse staffing levels and quality measures in Louisiana. Donabedian’s category structure, process, and outcome was the conceptual framework used to develop the research questions. The data included the quality of care deficiency score and the quality measures found in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid datasets. The quality measures were the deficiencies and the prevalence of nursing home residents with pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections, and physical restraints. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the relationship between nurse staffing levels and the quality measures. The findings suggested that RNs, nonprofits, chain-affiliated nursing homes, and smaller facilities are important to improve the quality of care in Louisiana nursing homes. These variables were associated with fewer quality of care deficiencies and fewer pressure ulcers. These findings have implications for social change. This information may help inform and direct policy makers in the development and implementation of Medicaid-managed long-term services and supports programs in order to improve the quality of care of a vulnerable population: the elderly and disabled.

The Aftermath of Violence: The Lived Experience Phenomena of Assult in Nursing by Kathleen Clark, RN, Ph.D.

February, 2016

As Chair of Dr, Clark's Faculty Dissertation Committee, I am pleased to present the Abstract of her  Ph.D. Dissertation from Walden University.  Drs. Jeanne Connors and Raymond Thron served as Members of the Faculty Dissertation Committee.

Abstract

Despite the high incidence of violence directed at registered nurses while on duty, there is limited qualitative data that explores the lived experience of returning to the workplace after an assaultive incident. This phenomenological study sought to explore and analyze the phenomena of registered nurses who are employed in high-risk settings. The research questions considered the detailed descriptions of the experiences of nurses returning to the workplace. The conceptual framework was resiliency, as these participants continued to survive and thrive after the adverse assaultive events. Data were collected using in-depth interviews from purposeful sampling. Nine registered nurses working in the high risk areas of inpatient psychiatry and emergency departments provided detailed descriptions about the phenomena. Data management was an inductive, iterative analysis completed and facilitated by the use of NVivo 10 software program. The study found that participants had a brief emotional response post assault mitigated by the community of nursing personnel from their immediate surroundings and felt that assault was “part of the job.” Providing a true culture of safety would include enhancements to the internal community of bedside nursing practice. In addition, research is needed on interventions that can effectively enhance the internal community after assault by patients. This study contributes to positive social change by providing registered nurses, an oppressed group, a voice to mitigate negative consequences associated with assault in the hospital setting.